There are those who would advocate that the voice of religion be silenced, or at least relegated to the purely private sphere.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The way to silence religious disputes is to take no notice of them.
Private religious speech can't be discriminated against. It has to be treated equally with secular speech.
A moment of silence is not inherently religious.
We should silence anyone who opposes the right to freedom of speech.
Religion has to stay in the heart, not in politics. It is private.
Silence is argument carried out by other means.
As long as there are religions, there are going to be people who are hiding their rottenness behind the veil of religion.
Many CEOs and leaders think that silence is indeed golden, that consensus is bliss. It is - sometimes. But more often what it signifies is that there are no respected processes for surfacing concerns and dissent.
Others don't want to listen to viewpoints that members of the church have.
I am rather inclined to silence.
No opposing quotes found.