They say it is better to be poor and happy than rich and miserable, but how about a compromise like moderately rich and just moody?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Sometimes a little compromise isn't a bad thing. You don't need to be precious about it.
You don't seem to realize that a poor person who is unhappy is in a better position than a rich person who is unhappy. Because the poor person has hope. He thinks money would help.
Money can't buy happiness, but it can make you awfully comfortable while you're being miserable.
Sometimes compromise is painful.
Money can't buy you happiness but it does bring you a more pleasant form of misery.
Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another - too often ending in the loss of both.
No one is really miserable who has not tried to cheapen life.
Most people would rather be certain they're miserable, than risk being happy.
About the only difference between the poor and the rich, is this, the poor suffer misery, while the rich have to enjoy it.
There is no dramatic difference in happiness on the part of people who are wealthy.