When we are confronted with extreme situations, we forget about moral issues; we simply act and must then accept the consequences.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
As we develop the moral aspect of our lives, we often adapt standards of right and wrong that serve as guides and deterrents for our conduct.
For me, an area of moral clarity is: you're in front of someone who's suffering and you have the tools at your disposal to alleviate that suffering or even eradicate it, and you act.
Moral justification is a powerful disengagement mechanism. Destructive conduct is made personally and socially acceptable by portraying it in the service of moral ends. This is why most appeals against violent means usually fall on deaf ears.
One might rationally argue that individual human beings should be free choose what moral behavior they approve of, and which they don't, subject to the constraints of the law.
For me, the moral difficulties lie in the continual pressure brought to bear on my friends and immediate family, pressure which is not directed against me personally but which at the same time is all around me.
It's through the small things that we develop our moral imagination, so that we can understand the sufferings of others.
The most painful moral struggles are not those between good and evil, but between the good and the lesser good.
Circumstances cause us to act the way we do. We should always bear this in mind before judging the actions of others. I realized this from the start during World War II.
The highest possible stage in moral culture is when we recognize that we ought to control our thoughts.
Circumstances dictate your set of values, your set of morals.