If the Muslim is Sharia-compliant, that is in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If someone is supporting Sharia, that is doing something wrong.
Sharia is the impetus behind multinational diplomatic efforts to accommodate Sharia blasphemy prohibitions on expression that offends Muslims.
We would be able to deal with Islam if we were allowed to deal with it in the way we think we should.
It's hard to imagine any Muslim fessing up to their secret proclivity for Sharia law knowing they would be deported if they gave the wrong answer.
Sharia law does not exist in the Koran. It was created by man.
I do stand in opposition to those who want to implement Sharia and essentially attack the Constitution of the United States.
I think that most people in the Middle East, at least 50%, believe in being sharia-compliant. If you're sharia-compliant or want to impose sharia law, the United States is the wrong place for you.
Comments that suggest that Muslims should be banned from the United States are offensive and unconstitutional.
I would never agree to an exclusive Muslim sovereignty over areas that are religiously important to Jews and Christians.
We've got some people who think Shariah law oughta be the law of the land, forget the Constitution. But the guns are there, the Second Amendment is there, to make sure all of the rest of the amendments are followed.
No opposing quotes found.