Newt changed the frame of reference of all of our candidates. That's why we won so big in 1994.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Newt has two transitions behind him. First he had to capture control of the House. He had to get the Republican budget through. He had to get the Contract With America through. He has done that.
Newt Gingrich had to work hard - getting Republican candidates to sign the Contract with America - to nationalize the election that swept Republicans to victory in 1994. A Democratic anti-Tea Party campaign would do that for the Republicans - nationalize the election, gratis - in 2010.
Newt correctly assumes that the American public is beginning to look down the road and at least distinguish the landmarks on either side and know where it wants go. We have a chance to lead it there.
I think Newt Gingrich has a proven track record of changing Washington and getting results.
Moderates shouldn't be nervous about Newt because he has a vision, he's laid it forward. He's fundamentally leading us in the way that middle class Americans want to go.
When you look at the results that Newt Gingrich got when he was speaker, he got results for the American people.
Everyone matures. When I was Newt's age, I thought I had the right answer to things. The baby-boomers as political leaders are still on trial by the American people.
Newt Gingrich's job to capture the Congress was to give Republican candidates an edge and a distinction from their Democratic opponent. That required a very high profile, some very strong language.
I'm not a Gingrich fan. He's just difficult to work with. It's either Newt's way or the highway.
Am I the only person covering politics who ever noticed that Newt Gingrich is actually a nincompoop?
No opposing quotes found.