Negotiating with the Taliban must be done from a position of strength. Negotiating from a position of weakness would be a disaster.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The Taliban has not, in my judgment, in any significant way changed their fundamental goal and objective, which is to take over Afghanistan and return to running that country. It doesn't mean that we shouldn't have negotiation talks with them. I think we should. But we've got to be clear-eyed about it.
We don't see that the Taliban ultimately can succeed, and it's a combination both of what the international community can do to support Afghanistan, not just in the short term, but over the long term.
I mean, the Taliban, my view is that they have been weakened. We have not seen them able to conduct any kind of organized attack to regain any territory that they've lost. We've seen levels of violence going down.
I mean, the Taliban, my view is that they have been weakened.
Women and children were slaughtered by the Taliban. You are going to sit down and negotiate with these folks? They never lived up to an agreement. The Pakistanis tried in '08, the Russians tried it when they were there. George Bush tried it in '05. It has never worked.
The Taliban is resilient.
It is in Pakistan's own interest that the Afghan army is able to fight effectively against the Taliban, which is more likely if they continue to have American advisers at their side.
I don't think the Taliban will ever come back to take Afghanistan, no.
I say to the Taliban: surrender the terrorists; or surrender power. It's your choice.
Talking to the Taliban is a process the Afghans have to manage. It is their country.
No opposing quotes found.