Basing my conclusions on experience I am absolutely convinced not only of survival but of demonstrated survival, demonstrated by occasional interaction with matter in such a way as to produce physical results.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I've always believed in survival.
I'm a survivor - a living example of what people can go through and survive.
Survival, in the cool economics of biology, means simply the persistence of one's own genes in the generations to follow.
I'm a survivalist and a survivor.
I'm tolerant of believers, but I'm agnostic. I'm curious to see how scientists will integrate the near-death experience into their research and if it will be explained.
Research challenges the materialistic understanding of death, according to which biological death represents the final end of existence and of all conscious activity.
The reason why I have survived as long as I have survived is what my friends, comrades and supporters thought was an extraordinarily cautious approach.
I tried out various experiments described in treatises on physics and chemistry, and the results were sometimes unexpected. At times, I would be encouraged by a little unhoped-for success; at others, I would be in the deepest despair because of accidents and failures resulting from my inexperience.
Survival is nothing more than recovery.
Human survival is something that you can't see in another person; you can see if someone has that will to survive or that will to win; you can't see that, you can only watch that evolve over time.