It is not with architecture that one can disseminate any political ideology.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think architecture is rarely the product of a single ideology. It's more like it can be shaped by a really big idea. It can accommodate a lot of life forms.
Architecture is art, nothing else.
I don't think architecture is radical. How can something that takes years and costs millions be radical?
Architects feel empowered to give opinions about politics and sociology and philosophy without knowing much about it. Kind of in the same way that they think they can design furniture or fashion or utensils for dining.
Architecture is the reaching out for the truth.
Architecture is not a profession for the faint-hearted, the weak-willed, or the short-lived.
No architecture is so haughty as that which is simple.
Architecture is always political.
Architecture is definitely a political act.
Architecture will always express the technical and social progress of the country in which it is carried out. If we wish to give it the human content that it lacks, we must participate in the political struggle.