A man's face is his autobiography. A woman's face is her work of fiction.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
A face is a road map of someone's life. Without any need to amplify that or draw attention to it, there's a great deal that's communicated about who this person is and what their life experiences have been.
A man's face as a rule says more, and more interesting things, than his mouth, for it is a compendium of everything his mouth will ever say, in that it is the monogram of all this man's thoughts and aspirations.
One of the things that all authors of fiction must learn to judge is whether - and in what detail - to describe the face of a character.
Every man's work, whether it be literature, or music or pictures or architecture or anything else, is always a portrait of himself.
The face is the mirror of the mind, and eyes without speaking confess the secrets of the heart.
The face is the soul of the body.
The human face is the organic seat of beauty. It is the register of value in development, a record of Experience, whose legitimate office is to perfect the life, a legible language to those who will study it, of the majestic mistress, the soul.
What is a face, really? Its own photo? Its make-up? Or is it a face as painted by such or such painter? That which is in front? Inside? Behind? And the rest? Doesn't everyone look at himself in his own particular way? Deformations simply do not exist.
If you've written a powerful book about a woman and your publisher then puts a 'feminine' image on the cover, it 'types' the book.
Quite often my narrator or protagonist may be a man, but I'm not sure he's the more interesting character, or if the more complex character isn't the woman.
No opposing quotes found.