For a man to strike any women is most brutal, and I, as well as everyone else, think this far worse than any attempt to shoot, which, wicked as it is, is at least more comprehensible and more courageous.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Men are distinguished from women by their commitment to do violence rather than to be victimized by it.
I think violence against women in America has become ordinary - it's been made absolutely acceptable.
By all measures men are the more violent gender.
Anger has been a really big deal for women: how can we express it without feeling that, as the physically weaker sex, we won't get killed. The alpha-woman was burned at the stake and had her head chopped off in days of old.
Perhaps the strongest evidence that women have as broad and deep a capacity for physical aggression as men is anecdotal. And as with men, this capacity has expressed itself in acts from the brave to the brutal, the selfless to the senseless.
As women are empowered, violence can come down, for a number of reasons. By all measures, men are the more violent gender.
Murder is about power and the more powerful women get the more it will change the good that they do and the bad that they do.
Well, the tyranny of masculinity and the tyranny of patriarchy I think has been much more deadly to men than it has to women. It hasn't killed our hearts. It's killed men's hearts. It's silenced them; it's cut them off.
I've never felt like a woman fighting in a male world; I've never felt penalised.
Men ought either to be indulged or utterly destroyed, for if you merely offend them they take vengeance, but if you injure them greatly they are unable to retaliate, so that the injury done to a man ought to be such that vengeance cannot be feared.