It doesn't seem to me strange that children should like the macabre, the sensational, and the forbidden.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
They are always very lax about putting restrictions on violence for children's movies, which I think is much more harrowing than sexuality for children.
Fairy tales, before they were sanitized, were very dark, and kids love that. 'Coraline' by Neil Gaiman feels like Beckett for kids. I think there's plenty of room for that. And I think there's a danger of being too patronizing to children, having things too sanitized.
Kids are so fiercely opinionated, that if they love the Harry Potter books and they go see the movie, they'll be the first to say, 'That was wrong! They didn't get that right!' They're storytellers themselves. They're critics. They're going to have the critical opinion.
There is a charm about the forbidden that makes it unspeakably desirable.
Dark books do appeal to kids because they have nice, sheltered lives - and they also appeal to children who are going through pretty hard times themselves.
I just don't know when we all decided that if it doesn't fit in a Happy Meal box, it's not for kids. I remember flying monkeys in the Wizard of Oz, and I grew up watching Monty Python. I think that kids can handle a lot more than we give them credit for, especially when it comes to the absurd.
I like the influence of the macabre, but I don't believe in ghosts.
Basically the children who watch it just see the little characters they love, and so they're not discerning about whether it looks great or it's a great story or anything.
Children should enjoy the few years they have just being a kid.
I have a particular dislike for children's films. I'm way past the novelty aspect.