I'm a writer and a photographer - I'm totally aware that doesn't always translate to TV.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
TV-makers usually don't know much about photography.
I see TV as a picture medium rather than a narrative medium.
TV is a writer's medium.
I had the traditional print view of TV journalists: Those are pretty people who get paid a lot of money and don't do any work. It turned out I was wrong.
Unless you're a big movie star, regular television work is going to bring you more exposure than anything. Everybody has a television; not everybody goes to the movies.
TV is the place that writers want to be.
The weird thing about working in television is that you only see the people that you're in scenes with.
Film and television is just a different technique in terms of how to approach the camera but basically the job is the same; but what you learn as a craft in theater, you can then learn to translate that into any mediums.
In TV, there's so much compromise, it does start to grate a bit. But if you're a writer or an actor, it really is the place to be.
I write for film or, in this case, television when I haven't got a play cooking.
No opposing quotes found.