Once you start bombing in Syria, when you start looking for targets, there will be a lot.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We need to significantly increase the number of bombing runs we're conducting in Iraq and Syria.
On one level, bombing ISIS is easy. The U.S. knows where the group operates. There's no need for a ten-year hunt like the one for Osama bin Laden. The terror group has two capital cities: Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria. Al-Qaeda never had such an obvious home address.
There are a lot of other terrorist targets we ought to be focusing on. Well, there is Syria, for example, which is pumping through - because of Iran, is pumping weapons on into Hezbollah and so forth - which is then producing a lot of agony in Palestine and in Israel. We ought to be doing a bit to try to stop that.
According to the FBI and the director of national intelligence, Syria's becoming a perfect platform to strike our nation. I've got a very simple strategy as your president against ISIL. Whatever it takes, as long as it takes, to defeat them.
At some point, there is going to be a terrorist diaspora out of Syria like we've never seen before.
I would have thought that if you're going to try to punish the Syrians and prevent them from using chemical weapons again, the thing to do is a one-time strike. Maybe a cruise missile strike at one or two of their air bases just so they know what they're going to gain from using chemical weapons on the battlefield.
The threat that Syria might transfer more advanced weapons to Hezbollah has existed for a long time.
The presence of jihadis in Syria should be no surprise.
We must do everything we can to be more aggressive in confronting Syria about what they are doing in Iraq.
If Syria wants to be part of the international community, there are some conditions that they have to meet. And the first one is to stop embracing the terrorism.
No opposing quotes found.