I am for an art that takes into account the direct effect of the elements as they exist from day to day apart from representation.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We want to answer this classical question, who am I? So I think that most of our works are for art, or whatever we do, including science or religion, tried to answer that question.
The basis of art is truth, both in matter and in mode.
I suppose an artist takes the elements of his life and rearranges them and then has them perceived by others as though they were the elements of their lives.
I'm inspired by nature. Other artist's work is important for developing my perception.
Art is not merely an imitation of the reality of nature, but in truth a metaphysical supplement to the reality of nature, placed alongside thereof for its conquest.
Artwork is a representation of our devotion to life.
To change your phrase somewhat, I know that I like an art where disparate elements form an entity.
The thing about art for me is that you can go on theorising your work forever, because it's open to interpretation.
It is art that makes life, makes interest, makes importance... and I know of no substitute whatever for the force and beauty of its process.
It is art that makes life, makes interest, makes importance and I know of no substitute whatever for the force and beauty of its process.