Art history is less explosive than the rest of history, so it sinks faster into the pulverized regions of time.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
History speaks to artists. It changes the artist's thinking and is constantly reshaping it into different and unexpected images.
Art history looks at art works and the people who have created them.
History develops, art stands still.
I'm not as much a history person as an art person, but I mean, you can read history through art.
Of late years (perhaps as a result of our political changes) art has borrowed from history more than ever.
The history of modern art is also the history of the progressive loss of art's audience. Art has increasingly become the concern of the artist and the bafflement of the public.
The history of art is the history of revivals.
There was once a time when art history and film were basically the same medium, but art history is frozen in late-19th-century technology that has survived into the early 21st century.
I think that art is supposed to be ahead of the times.
It's easier to make art for a society at a certain point in time with an understanding of what's going on.
No opposing quotes found.