Art's development should be dialectical and not metaphysical.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Art is magic... But how is it magic? In its metaphysical development? Or does some final transformation culminate in a magic reality? In truth, the latter is impossible without the former. If creation is not magic, the outcome cannot be magic.
Art is not a thing; it is a way.
Art resides in the quality of doing, process is not magic.
Art revolves around creating something that isn't there.
Nothing is art if it does not come from nature.
You should be able to be influenced by art no matter where it comes from.
Hopefully if you create something fine, people will relate to it, so you're communicating with people, and you're not in a void. On the other hand, because you're always creating and transforming, art always separates you - always.
Art is not merely an imitation of the reality of nature, but in truth a metaphysical supplement to the reality of nature, placed alongside thereof for its conquest.
Art is about play and about transcendent meanings, not reducible to politics.
Art is a sense of magic.