No historical analogies are exactly precise.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
History seems to be so clumsy.
I'm really great at making terrible analogies.
One can imagine that the ultimate mathematician is one who can see analogies between analogies.
I am no historian but have tried to stick tight to the facts.
No apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
A chronicle is very different from history proper.
I study history in order to give an interpretation.
If I'm writing, I'll say something metaphorical or approximate, whereas scientists are very precise.
History is more or less bunk.
Whatever can be noted historically can be found within history.