I'm a huge fan of home recording. I think it levels the playing field. You don't need $100,000 to record a studio CD.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
That's my favorite subject because it really levels the playing field for artists these days. You don't have to sell out to the record company. You don't have to get a five hundred thousand dollars, or whatever, and pay them back for the rest of your life to record a record.
I don't have a formal home recording studio, but I can record tracks on my computer upstairs in my office.
I'll probably have to open a recording studio at some point because I won't be able to pay the bills.
There's no question that a vinyl record is a lot nicer than a CD. It's nicer to hold in your hands, you can do more with it.
There is a whole aspect of freedom to recording at home that you don't get in a studio. The possibilities are infinite, and there is no reason not to explore them.
I buy records - vinyl. I have a record player at home.
Now, you can just get a laptop, get some software, put a microphone on it and make a record. You have to know how to do it. It does help if you've had 35 or 40 years of experience in the studio. But, it still levels the playing field so artists can record their own stuff.
To be honest, producing records interests me less at the moment and I really don't want to get involved in album projects that are going to take up a lot of time.
I now have a home recording studio, which I can operate entirely on my own, as well as a portable version of the same which allows me to record anywhere I like and simply swap out the hard drives for use in the home studio.
My home studio is my private instrument for me only. It's not intended to record anyone but me.
No opposing quotes found.