Female ambition is such a complicated thing to play because it is an aggressive quality, and people respond very badly to women exhibiting any kind of aggression.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There seems to be a theme running through the women I play. They take their circumstances and try to make the best of them.
The denial of female aggression is a destructive myth. It robs an entire gender of a significant spectrum of power, leaving women less than equal with men and effectively keeping them 'in their place' and under control.
You don't have to play masculine to be a strong woman.
Women, by their nature, are not exceptional chess players: they are not great fighters.
The more potent, unasked question is how society at large reacts to eager, voluntary violence by females, and to the growing evidence that women can be just as aggressive as men.
Women are such strong, powerful leaders, and a lot of the time, we play it silent.
Perhaps the strongest evidence that women have as broad and deep a capacity for physical aggression as men is anecdotal. And as with men, this capacity has expressed itself in acts from the brave to the brutal, the selfless to the senseless.
Most women don't play like guys do: they don't wrestle, fight, get into brawls. They don't know how to express themselves in a physical, active way.
Every man must play the part of his ambition. If you are trying to be a successful man, you must play the part.
The female loves to play man against man. And if she is in a position to do it, there is not one who will resist.