I think if you have a two-story office and you hire someone who's handicapped, it might be reasonable to let him have an office on the first floor rather than the government saying you have to have a $100,000 elevator.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
People didn't always see a person with a disability who had to use a ramp or elevator as people who have been given unnecessary privileges. But I run into that often now. People are saying, 'Why do we have to go to great expense for these people?'
If you're lucky enough to do well, it's your responsibility to send the elevator back down.
We are all in this together. We want to have, I suppose, a single point of entry so that anyone coming near a disability service can get a very complete picture. Government needs to understand that picture, and we need to be able to offer somebody a one-stop shop.
Usually, the energy in elevators is so awkward; I mean, I can't imagine the politics in the ones in the Conde Nast building.
I feel it's a responsibility for anyone who breaks through a certain ceiling... to send the elevator back down and give others a helpful lift.
Well, you could take several stories off the buildings of most U.S. government agencies and we'd all probably be better for it too.
After seeing 'Big,' I wanted an elevator that opened directly into my apartment, just like Tom Hanks did.
To go to the White House is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. In fact, the building is not that big.
Never take an elevator in city hall.
The problem of the tall office building is one of the most stupendous, one of the most magnificent opportunities that the Lord of Nature in His beneficence has ever offered to the proud spirit of man.