That's the whole point of... of prosecutorial discretion in the judicial system. It's finding a just outcome in an individual case.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are bombshells that happen in court. Especially when the defense doesn't share discovery of material the way the prosecution does, and so surprises always happen. Things pop out without warning.
No one can just file a charge and go directly to a jury trial. That just cannot happen.
Decisions on a matter as serious as charging an individual with a crime cannot be decided on anything less than complete examination of all available evidence. Anything less is not justice.
The great joy of being a prosecutor is that you don't take whatever case walks in the door. You evaluate the case; you make your best judgement. You only go forward if you believe that the defendant is guilty.
One thing I know from personal experience, judges hate it when parties talk publicly about their cases. There are a lot of things about our criminal legal system that need to be changed, and this is just one of them. Prosecutors know how to play the press. Most defendants don't.
Judges need to restrict themselves to the proper resolution of the case before them. They need to avoid the temptation to set broad policy.
When a person is found not guilty, they're found not guilty.
One thing I learned a long time ago as a prosecutor is that it's tough to get people to obey a law if there is not penalty for breaking it.
When a person is found less guilty than he is suspected, he is concluded more innocent than he really is.
I'm a career prosecutor. I have been trained, and my experience over decades, is to make decisions after a review of the evidence and the facts. And not to jump up with grand gestures before I've done that. Some might interpret that as being cautious. I would tell you that's just responsible.
No opposing quotes found.