Unlike fashion, art isn't applied. It doesn't have to serve anybody. It doesn't have to be there for any other reason than to give an impression of what the world is about.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Art is the way people see things, and I think it's great when individuals can find in fashion something they truly believe is artistic.
Art is essentially communication. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. That's why people make art, so other people can relate to it.
Fashion is not separate from art. It is inextricably woven into how we open ourselves to the world and articulates the exchanges of power both real and imagined.
Art has to be reflective of our society.
Art is for anyone. It just isn't for everyone. Still, over the past decade, its audience has hugely grown, and that's irked those outside the art world, who get irritated at things like incomprehensibility or money.
My position is that serious and good art has always existed to help, to serve, humanity. Not to indict. I don't see how art can be called art if its purpose is to frustrate humanity.
What strikes me is the fact that in our society, art has become something which is only related to objects, and not to individuals, or to life.
It's the duty of all novelists, all painters, all musicians, all people who try to make art move: to look for something they feel authentically, without paying attention to styles.
Art is not in some far-off place. A work of art is the expression of a man's whole personality, sensibility and ability.
Art is subject to arbitrary fashion.