It costs so much to make films. With a novel, you can write the whole thing on a ream of paper from Staples for $4.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Anyone who has an imagination can write a book - it's cheap to do - but movies are big money.
Because making movies is such an expensive endeavor, other media such as books and comics have long been a more feasible way to experiment with truly new ideas.
There's no point in making a film out of a great book. The book's already great. What's the point?
I usually make films with $2 and a paper clip.
Look at it this way: if you write the novel of 'Cold Mountain,' it costs exactly the same to produce and market as a novel set in a room. If you make the film, the disparity of costs is huge.
As long as you keep your budgets small, there's a way of making films.
If I'm in the bookstore, and I see a 700-page novel, my first thought is, 'Ooh, how could you cut this down to size and make a movie out of it?'
A lot of books, if you take them at face value, they're just not gonna work as films.
The writer in movies is about as low as you can get and you really are a hired hand. You are paid a lot of money to be treated like dirt.
Other writers, producers, and directors of low-budget films would often put down the film they were making, saying it was just something to make money with. I never felt that. If I took the assignment, I'd give it my best shot.
No opposing quotes found.