I was never much bothered about moral questions like, 'How could there be a good God when there's so much evil in the world?'
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Morality must relate, at some level, to the well-being of conscious creatures. If there are more and less effective ways for us to seek happiness and to avoid misery in this world - and there clearly are - then there are right and wrong answers to questions of morality.
When I was young, I had a very clear point of view on things in life, on moral questions. There was a black and white viewpoint on my world. As I've gotten older, I see the grey areas appear.
Morality is of the highest importance - but for us, not for God.
The moral landscape is the framework I use for thinking about questions of morality and human values in universal terms.
If there was no moral evil upon earth, there would be no physical evil.
Morality is not just any old topic in psychology but close to our conception of the meaning of life. Moral goodness is what gives each of us the sense that we are worthy human beings.
As for morality, well that's all tied up with the question of consciousness.
One of the great questions of philosophy is, do we innately have morality, or do we get it from celestial dictation? A study of the Ten Commandments is a very good way of getting into and resolving that issue.
It makes me upset, if not angry, when people assume that there can be no morality without a religious framework. If there's a moral framework without all that religious stuff, it's more valuable.
I do not want to suggest that you have to be religious to be moral.
No opposing quotes found.