I've always avoided sequels, unless I felt there was something fresh.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I pointedly avoid doing sequels, since for the most part I find that a sequel rarely stands up to the original.
I don't like sequels at all. If the movie's good the first time, why bother?
I think you kind of need to acknowledge that the reason why sequels do well is because people that loved the first one come back.
I'm not big on sequels; I've done them, but I like doing little things that have their own timelessness to them, classic type things, and then you go onto something new.
I didn't really want to do another sequel. I go to those movies, and I just sort of enjoy them like a viewer.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
I'm not into things that feel like a sequel. There's just something magical about when something happens for the first time.
My gut feeling about sequels is that they should be premeditated: You should try to write a trilogy first or at least sketch out a trilogy if you have any faith in your film.
I've always made sequels, even when I was making Super 8 movies if the audience liked it.
I am a fan of sequels even though they are inevitably awful.