What guarantees - or at least semi-guarantees - good ballets is good choreographers, and they are thin on the ground.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I have been very lucky to work in so many new ballets, but that is what a dancer's work is.
I find that dancers are only well trained in ballet these days.
Ballet is such a disciplined craft and it has given me a good grounding.
You can usually tell how healthy a ballet company is by the degree of your interest in the middle ranks of the dancers - the not-yet stars, the up-and-comers.
One of the eternal mysteries of ballet is how untalented choreographers find backers for their work, and then find good dancers to perform in it. Is it irresistible charm? Chutzpah? Pure determination? Blackmail? Or are so many supposedly knowledgeable people just plain blind?
Ballet is an incredibly difficult, beautiful art form that takes a lot of training, a lot of time, and a lot of hard work.
Yes, bad or mediocre ballets can be useful to the dancers and temporarily fun for the audience, but in the long run, the lowering of standards can only erode the art form we all love.
You get used to working with one choreographer. You kind of get stuck in that vein and you work your way out of it, picking up someone else's style, their flavor. It takes a bit of time.
Ballet has a very small audience, unfortunately.
Every ballet, whether or not successful artistically or with the public, has given me something important.
No opposing quotes found.