As we segregate by income into different communities, schools in lower-income areas have fewer resources than ever.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We cannot ignore the disparity in resources that continue to plague many of our school systems, especially those serving predominantly inner-city minority and impoverished children.
Across the globe, disadvantaged children are not living up to their potential because if they attend school at all, the schools are usually not designed to meet their extra needs.
Kids in urban and rural areas face so many challenges, and they show up at schools that don't have the extra capacity or extra resources to meet their needs.
All over the world, children facing the challenges of poverty attend schools that aren't designed to meet their extra needs; across country lines, the lives of marginalized kids look far more similar than they do different.
The system that had grown up in most states is that wealthy districts with an affluent population can afford to spend a lot more on their public school systems than the poorer districts.
Education makes children less dependent upon others and opens doors to better jobs and career possibilities.
We're now segregating our schools based on economics; we're segregating our schools based on where a child's parents live. And it has the same corrosive effect of destroying people's opportunity as racial segregation did.
If you have fewer teenagers having children, they could focus more on their vocational development.
Kids who live in low income areas face extra challenges and show up at schools that were not designed to meet their extra needs.
Nationally, overwhelmingly non-white schools receive $1,000 less per pupil than overwhelmingly white schools.
No opposing quotes found.