For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Until the masculine role is humanized, women will tend to be much better at solving dangerous conflicts.
This idea that males are physically aggressive and females are not has distinct drawbacks for both sexes.
Biologically speaking, if something bites you it's more likely to be female.
By all measures men are the more violent gender.
Well, the tyranny of masculinity and the tyranny of patriarchy I think has been much more deadly to men than it has to women. It hasn't killed our hearts. It's killed men's hearts. It's silenced them; it's cut them off.
In my own writing, I avoid 'female' and try to say 'woman' because I feel that the word 'female' has connotations of not just biology but also non-human mammals. The idea of 'female' to me is more appropriate for a female animal.
Men are by nature merely indifferent to one another; but women are by nature enemies.
There is no such thing as a dangerous woman; there are only susceptible men.
Speaking as a biologist, I think women are less aggressive than men, and they play a larger role in the early education of the young and helping them overcome their genetic heirloom.
It is fatal to be a man or woman pure and simple: one must be a woman manly, or a man womanly.