From the beginning on, newspapers have prospered for one reason: giving readers the news that they want.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
From that moment on, the newspaper became a highly lucrative investment for those with a talent for making money or for publishers wanting to gain a fortune.
Newspapers with declining circulations can complain all they want about their readers and even say they have no taste. But you will still go out of business over time. A newspaper is not a public trust - it has a business model that either works or it doesn't.
There is a long history of newspapers being doomed. They were doomed by radio. They were doomed by television. They were probably doomed by the telegraph way back when.
The printed newspaper is a powerful showcase for news, opinion and advertising.
A good newspaper is never nearly good enough but a lousy newspaper is a joy forever.
Great journalism will always attract readers. The words, pictures and graphics that are the stuff of journalism have to be brilliantly packaged; they must feed the mind and move the heart.
In essence, I see the value of journalism as resting in a twofold mission: informing the public of accurate and vital information, and its unique ability to provide a truly adversarial check on those in power.
I think we'll always have newspapers, but they'll lose influence.
Think of it: television producers joining with newspapers to tell stories. It's journalism of the future. Advertising will follow the crowd - the 'crowd' being viewers and readers, of course, which could bring revenue back into journalism.
God, newspapers have been making up stories forever. This kind of trifling and fooling around is not a function of the New Journalism.