Fashion has always been in conflict with convention. Style involves some knowledge of both. But you can pretty much forget these seasonal injunctions.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Fashion only seems to make sense if it's rooted in some dimension of history or if it feels like a continuation of an idea.
I think that fashion is industrial, whereas style is ideological. So they're not necessarily connected.
In general, fashion is decorative, it's protective, it acknowledges that the world does involve conflict, and you might be attacked by assumptions, presumptions, and attitudes.
I think it's an old fashioned notion that fashion needs to be exclusive to be fashionable.
Fashion is a very particular world, as you know.
If fashion has a political significance, it is probably culturally, as a camouflage.
Fashion is an imposition, a reign on freedom.
Fashion is not just about trends. It's about political history. You can trace it from the ancient Romans to probably until the '80s, and you can see defining moments that were due either to revolutions or changes in politics.
As you know, the business is cyclic with styles. It's no different from clothing styles.
Fashion is just an interpretation of the culture around us.