If a violent act towards a woman takes place, and the inspiration for that act is violence in cinema, the inspiration for that act would have come from somewhere else if movies didn't exist.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I have never seen a connection between cinematic violence towards women and actual violence towards women in society.
I don't think movies are the reason why this violence exists, I think it's going to happen whether movies are there or not.
I think if there was no violence in our world, there would be no violence in film. Violence is a part of human nature, and obviously it's a troublesome part of human nature. You always have responsibilities when you portray violence in what angle you put down on that scene.
Cinema has only been around for about 100 years. Has all of the world's violence towards women taken place only within the past 100 years?
There is violence in real life but I would never impose violence in a film just to attract the audience.
Violence is used to portray what happens in a film. It only helps portray the actors and what they do. I think it is more about the story, when you have something to play off of.
I think violence has always been popular, way before movies started being made.
I don't think violence on film breeds violence in life. Violence in life breeds violence in films.
I think violence in a cinematic context can be, if handled in a certain way, very seductive.
Violence has been a part of films since the beginning of time. It's been a form of entertainment.