One of the reasons why I think people have gone from reading mainstream newspapers to the Internet is because they realize they're being lied to.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
God, newspapers have been making up stories forever. This kind of trifling and fooling around is not a function of the New Journalism.
Journalism has changed tremendously because of the democratization of information. Anybody can put something up on the Internet. It's harder and harder to find what the truth is.
It is true that the Internet can be used to disseminate falsehoods quickly, but it just as quickly roots them out and exposes them in a way that the traditional model of journalism and its closed, insular, one-way form of communication could never do.
Well, I mean, the real attack on truth is tabloid journalism in the United States.
I think most things I read on the Internet and in newspapers are propaganda. Everyone from the 'New York Times' to Rupert Murdoch has a point of view and is putting forth their own propaganda. They're stuck with the facts as they are, but the way they interpret and frame them is wildly different.
Journalists, who are skeptical to begin with, simply do not like to be lied to or made fools of.
I have opened newspapers and read incredible lies.
I think almost every newspaper in the United States has lost circulation due to the Internet. I also think the Internet will lead to a lot of plagiarism in journalism.
People are worried about what's going to happen to journalism - and they should be. Every day, the blogosphere is getting better and print media is getting worse; you have to be an idiot not to see that.
People think that if they read something in the newspaper or see it on TV, it has to be true.
No opposing quotes found.