By supporting Reagan, evangelicals were not supporting womanizing or divorce, but they were endorsing Reagan's policies.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Evangelicals overwhelmingly voted for Ronald Reagan - not because he was the most religious candidate, but he possessed the quality evangelicals felt like was most important, and that is leadership.
If you'd have said Evangelical in 1957, most people wouldn't know what you were talking about. And then, they'd be against it.
Again and again as president, Reagan let it slip that he concurred with fundamentalists' belief that the world would end in a fiery Armageddon. This did not hurt him politically. The kind of people offended by such talk had already largely abandoned the Republican Party.
In America, evangelical churches have often been bastions of conservatism, providing support for the status quo.
Most Evangelicals claim to be politically non-partisan, and say they only identify with the Republican Party because the Republicans are committed to 'family values.'
It was funny that rank-and-file evangelicals were ahead of all the leadership. They saw for decades conservative Republicans had made promises to them on issues that were important to Christians and conservatives when they were running for office. But when they won, they didn't keep those promises.
Ronald Reagan never did much to make abortion illegal. He did, however, deliver videotaped greetings, fulsome in praise for his hosts, to antiabortion rallies on the Mall.
A significant fraction of evangelical voters appear more likely to ignore the candidates' specific economic and foreign policy platforms in favor of concerns about gay marriage or abortion.
I'm a conservative. I was an avid supporter of Ronald Reagan; I thought he was fabulous.
Ronald Reagan wasn't in the establishment of the Republican Party either, nor was Richard Nixon.