The scientist should treasure the riddles he can't solve, not explain them away at the outset.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The scientist is not a person who gives the right answers, he is one who asks the right questions.
The experimenter who does not know what he is looking for will not understand what he finds.
Amazingly when you add life and consciousness to the equation you can actually explain some of the biggest puzzles of science.
Heisenberg, Max Plank and Einstein, they all agreed that science could not solve the mystery of the universe.
Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.
It is, I think, particularly in periods of acknowledged crisis that scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their field. Scientists have not generally needed or wanted to be philosophers.
I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.
Under normal conditions the research scientist is not an innovator but a solver of puzzles, and the puzzles upon which he concentrates are just those which he believes can be both stated and solved within the existing scientific tradition.
Science never solves a problem without creating ten more.
Science has not solved problems, only shifted the points of problems.
No opposing quotes found.