All of which was OK, as that proved then, I certainly wouldn't contradict it as a necessary sense of things.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Neither with those nor with the others, with all I agree and dissent; in all part of truth and part of error must be seen.
The accepted versions of the Bible are all substantially correct.
Any necessary truth, whether a priori or a posteriori, could not have turned out otherwise.
Whatsoever is good; the same is also approved of God.
So I suppose poetry, language, the shaping of it, was and remains for me an effort to make sense out of essentially senseless situations.
There are clear cases in which 'understanding' literally applies and clear cases in which it does not apply; and these two sorts of cases are all I need for this argument.
If the truth contradicts deeply held beliefs, that is too bad.
Nothing is proved, all is permitted.
All things make sense; you just have to fathom how they make sense.
I think the biggest mistake I made was this wretched ability to see both sides of an argument.
No opposing quotes found.