The fact that we don't keep repeating tests in the same arena is not because the probability of the hypothesis showing its falsity in other arenas goes up after it has passed tests in one arena.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Much can often be learned by the repetition under different conditions, even if the desired result is not obtained.
Repeating is harder than anything else.
I loved tests because it was another form of competing, a healthy competition.
Repetition creates pattern. If I have a hundred of these, a hundred of those, it doesn't make any difference what these and those are. If I can repeat anything, I have the possibility of a pattern from hickory nuts and chicken eggs, shards of glass, branches. It doesn't make any difference.
I think different teams have different challenges as you go through.
That is never too often repeated, which is never sufficiently learned.
Adversity tests us from time to time and it is inevitable that this testing continues during life.
A good athlete always mentally replays a competition over and over, even in victory, to see what might be done to improve the performance the next time.
Where we have good, testable explanations, they then have to be tested, and we drop the ones that fail the tests.
Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again.