When we analyze this war in a materialistic way and ask when is it going to end and who will be the winner and the loser, it means that we do not see the endgame.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
War is a series of catastrophes that results in a victory.
War is a series of catastrophes which result in victory.
If we don't end war, war will end us.
It is simply not true that war is solely a means to an end, nor do people necessarily fight in order to obtain this objective or that. In fact, the opposite is true: people very often take up one objective or another precisely in order that they may fight.
There is hardly such a thing as a war in which it makes no difference who wins. Nearly always one side stands more or less for progress, the other side more or less for reaction.
War implies a lack of comprehension of mutual national interests; it means the undermining and even the end of culture.
The real peril of war lies not in military defeat. It lies in war itself, whether we win or lose.
In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.
We should not fight wars without a clearly defined end state... when you go to war, it can't be a half-step.
No war is over until the enemy says it's over.