But, then, Sampras won Wimbledon six times and that automatically puts him among the greatest.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'd won the Australian Open twice, but winning Wimbledon takes something special.
Not winning at Wimbledon is not going to bother me forever.
Look at Becker and Djokovic. If you look at Novak's record since Boris has been there, it's been phenomenal.
You can find flaws in Agassi and Sampras, but Federer has none.
You never know how long Federer is going to play, but in my opinion he has at least one or two more grand slams to win. It depends how long he stays motivated. For me, he is the greatest player to ever play the game.
Federer can be the best ever; he has the potential. The only question is whether he has the desire.
I know it's not the most important thing for me to win the most Grand Slams and be remembered in this world. I certainly don't have to win little tournaments here, there and everywhere, I don't have to win at all. Although I do want to.
I remember winning the first time, you know, suddenly everybody expects, well, okay, now he should win every time he tees it up, win six tournaments.
Wimbledon is the most prestigious tournament we have, and being able to win it with all the tradition, that's always been a dream of mine.
The only thing 'championship' about Wimbledon is its prestige.