And under our system, much like you see in the U.K., of course, a party working with another party can form a coalition and govern the country.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's impossible always to be with the majority in coalition government, especially when it's a very complicated coalition.
I am more convinced than ever that a lively two party system is essential to our democracy.
Of course, running a coalition government in a country like India is a difficult task. More so when Congress leads the coalition, since most of the political parties were anti-Congress. To have a coalition, to run a coalition government, you require a lot of adjustments, a lot of flexibility.
Individuals have little opportunity to get elected to Parliament under the label of the government party... unless they are in good standing with the Prime Minister and pledged to be cooperative.
It is important that the United States remain a two-party system. I'm a fellow who likes small parties and the Republican Party can't be too small to suit me.
It's very important that we unite as a party and as a country.
Remember that a civilized nation cannot just have one party; if there were only one party, this would merely be a dictatorship. Politics could not advance.
I think there's a lot of problems with being a two-party system.
When my party won the elections convincingly on February 18th, 2008, we immediately reached out to other parties to form broad-based coalitions of national unity in the National Assembly and in the four provincial assemblies.
A two-party system is way too good for those two parties.
No opposing quotes found.