Texts are always in flux.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think what matters most in literary work is the context, not the text.
Objects let you tell a narrative that encompasses everybody. Texts don't.
It seems that so much writing is being done in the nineteenth-century model, where every connection has to be thoroughly explained.
As a bookish adolescent, I sopped up texts as if I were blotting paper and they were fluid.
Life develops, changes, is in motion. The forms of literature are not.
Whenever you do a new interpretation of a great, previous text of any kind, you always look for some kind of immediate significance right now.
The reason is that till date, in spite of advances in information technology and strategies of information, the written word in the form of books still remains one of humanity's most enduring legacies.
Literature is news that stays news.
I've always been a composer dependent on texts.
Even this vein of writing is so foreign to me that I am amazed.