No, I think that we've got a basic discrepancy here between the rule of law versus the rule of man.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We are supposed to all be equal before the law, but we have a separate and distinct ruling class, and that is wrong.
In the first place I remark that no human law is perfect in its construction or execution.
You can't say 'because we decide we're different then we need a different set of laws.'
If the law doesn't apply equally to everybody, then you don't really have a system of law.
Either the law exists, or it does not.
No man's error becomes his own Law; nor obliges him to persist in it.
Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all.
Of course, a law that is selectively used is in one aspect even worse than a law that is generally used because it puts a lot of power in individuals' hands and makes government a rule, not of laws, but of people.
All human laws are, properly speaking, only declaratory; they have no power over the substance of original justice.
No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.