No one would want to read a book in which I explain the science of cloning because it would be very dull and it would also make no sense.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I would not want to see any relaxation of the law prohibiting human cloning.
Cloning, wow. Who would have thought? There should be a list of people who can and cannot clone themselves.
The cloning of humans is on most of the lists of things to worry about from Science, along with behaviour control, genetic engineering, transplanted heads, computer poetry and the unrestrained growth of plastic flowers.
There are a lot of people highly motivated to be the first to clone a human.
Human cloning is coming.
There are things I am more interested in than the clone thing. How are they trying to find their place in the world and make sense of their lives? To what extent can they transcend their fate? As time starts to run out, what are the things that really matter?
I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public - that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.
There is a pent-up demand from people who want to clone their dead children.
Cloning is great. If God made the original, then making copies should be fine.
Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.