Any work of architecture that has with it some discussion, some polemic, I think is good. It shows that people are interested, people are involved.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'm very interested in architecture.
I think all good architecture should challenge you, make you start asking questions. You don't have to understand it. You may not like it. That's OK.
I would like my architecture to inspire people to use their own resources, to move into the future.
If people want to see Beaux-Arts, it's fine with me. I'm interested in good architecture as anybody else.
I do believe architecture, and all art, should be content-driven. It should have something to say beyond the sensational.
I love architecture.
There's a Danish architecture firm called BIG. I love architecture, and I always check out their work; they're very good at reimagining the way we live. They put the human experience as the focus, with access to air and outdoor space.
I always look forward to the next project. That is one of the wonderful things about architecture - you always can hope for another project to design.
Architecture has always been a very idealistic profession. It's about making the world a better place, and it works over the generations because people go on vacation and they look for it.
Architecture has curled up in a ball and it's about itself. It has found itself either as a freakshow, where you're not sure if it's good or bad but at least it's interesting, or at the behest of forces of commerce.