The children of the unemployed achieve less in school and appear to have reduced long-term earnings prospects.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
With the right support, a child growing up in a dysfunctional household, who was destined for a lifetime on benefits could be put on an entirely different track - one which sees them move into fulfilling and sustainable work. In doing so, they will pull themselves out of poverty.
Across the globe, disadvantaged children are not living up to their potential because if they attend school at all, the schools are usually not designed to meet their extra needs.
Education makes children less dependent upon others and opens doors to better jobs and career possibilities.
If you have fewer teenagers having children, they could focus more on their vocational development.
It's hard to bring up your children on benefit. It's easier if you can do part- time work, or even full-time work, and actually have a better standard of living, and that's the direction in which we are going.
Kids who live in low income areas face extra challenges and show up at schools that were not designed to meet their extra needs.
Early investment in the lives of disadvantaged children will help reduce inequality, in both the short and the long run.
In addition to joblessness, of course, by the working of supply and demand, when you have a larger number of people unemployed, wages do not rise at the normal level, so that we had last year a drop in real wages.
Around 80% of Liberians are unemployed and only half of all children go to primary school. Just one in 20 go on to secondary school. Young children are on the streets instead of in the classrooms. We are not giving them the opportunity to learn and they will struggle to get jobs when they grow up.
The longer people are unemployed, the less employable they become. Skills become rusty; managers look more suspiciously at someone who has been out of work for years than a candidate already employed.
No opposing quotes found.