I'm not interested in creating a book that is read once and then placed on the shelf and forgotten.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I really strive to bring something new to each book. I don't want to write the same book over and over again.
I feel as though I've gotten to a point where I don't really want to set a book in any real place ever again.
I have this book club, and we don't read one book; we offer up a few suggestions and create a library over time.
I know in this time of great technological advancement, the idea of reading a book seems almost anachronistic, but I think it's worth preserving.
I don't think anyone wants a reader to be completely lost - certainly not to the point of giving up - but there's something to be said for a book that isn't instantly disposable, that rewards a second reading.
Ideally a book would have no order to it, and the reader would have to discover his own.
Probably not needing to be published would give me more time to think about a book.
While I'm writing, I'm also the first reader, and I want to write a book where I'm excited about what happens next.
I don't think I could set a book in a place without knowing it really well.
If there's a book you really want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it.
No opposing quotes found.