Corporations are not in business to be social-welfare organizations; they are there to make money.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Corporations aren't people. They have no brains, no consciences, no capacity for intent or guilt.
Corporate welfare isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Corporations that are formed for the purpose of earning profits do not have the constitutionally protected rights that natural citizens have. They should not spend their corporate dollars, Treasury dollars, to influence outcome of elections.
Companies are not charitable enterprises: They hire workers to make profits. In the United States, this logic still works. In Europe, it hardly does.
It makes no sense to talk of the social obligations of the corporation without reference to its economic obligations. The two are intertwined.
Let's face it: we live at a time when government is less and less powerful, less and less effective, and the agent of social change, at least for the immediate future, is the corporation.
Businesses who are members of Businesses for Social Responsibility or the Social Venture Network are internalizing costs on a voluntary basis and therefore raising their costs of doing business, but their competitors are not required to.
In my view, a corporation is not a person. A corporation does not have First Amendment rights to spend as much money as it wants, without disclosure, on a political campaign.
Corporations are social organizations, the theater in which men and women realize or fail to realize purposeful and productive lives.
Corporations are a fictional entity that are designed to make money, and they're neither people nor patriots.