Miracles are not contrary to nature, but only contrary to what we know about nature.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Some may claim that is it unscientific to speak of the operations of nature as miracles. But the point of the title lies in the paradox of finding so many wonderful things subservient to the rule of law.
I think miracles exist in part as gifts and in part as clues that there is something beyond the flat world we see.
I don't have a problem with the concept that miracles might occasionally occur at moments of great significance, where there is a message being transmitted to us by God Almighty. But as a scientist, I set my standards for miracles very high.
For some people, miracles serve as evidence of God's existence.
Miracles, in the sense of phenomena we cannot explain, surround us on every hand: life itself is the miracle of miracles.
I don't believe in miracles.
In those parts of the world where learning and science has prevailed, miracles have ceased; but in those parts of it as are barbarous and ignorant, miracles are still in vogue.
It is almost impossible to exaggerate the proneness of the human mind to take miracles as evidence, and to seek for miracles as evidence.
Man is the miracle in nature. God Is the One Miracle to man.
I don't believe in miracles because it's been a long time since we've had any.