Motion pictures are the art form of the 20th century, and one of the reasons is the fact that films are a slightly corrupted artform. They fit this century - they combine Art and business!
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Movies were never an art form, they were entertainment. It just evolved into an art form from there, and it's still evolving in different ways.
Motion capture has become very specialized but also still just a tool of filmmaking.
The art of motion pictures is pictorial and language comes a distant second.
It's very difficult to break into motion pictures, but it's oddly easier for directors today because of independent films and cable, who have inherited for the most part those films of substance that the studios are reluctant to finance.
Cinema is arguably the 20th century's most influential art form.
I look at the camera as sort of a missing link between motion picture photography and still photography.
I think technology has advanced so far now that there are some cameras on the market that give film a run for its money. It's all about flexibility in capturing images, and digital or film, it doesn't matter to me.
The cinema is an institution nowadays, with its roots sunk deep in the hearts of the millions of people who find enjoyment and entertainment in going to the pictures.
Cinema is an art form.
There's evidence of a social decline in direct proportion to technology and the industrialization of the motion picture industry.
No opposing quotes found.