I don't know what to say about literary critics. I think it's probably best to say nothing.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Sometimes literary critics review the book they wanted you to write, not the book you wrote, and that's very irksome.
I don't read critics, and I don't care what they say. You can't let them steal your soul. You do what the director and production is committed to doing. I just think it's terrible that critics have the power to keep people away from a good production.
I don't read the critics.
Critics have a problem with sentimentality. Readers do not. I write for readers.
Critics, at least generally, want to regard works of fiction as independent entities, whose virtues and failures must be reckoned apart from the circumstances of their creation, and even apart from the intentions of their creator.
There's no end to the inventiveness of critics, I tell you. Because they can't write fiction, they put their impulse into their analysis of work.
As for critics, one mediocre writer is more valuable than ten good critics. They are like haughty, barren spinsters lodged in a maternity ward.
I don't focus on the critics. Everyone who is making any difference in any field has critics. As long as I feel like I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing, then I don't worry about it.
I don't mind what the critics say, so long as I get some reaction. The worst thing is to be ignored.
I reach my readers regardless of what the critics have written.
No opposing quotes found.