No matter how many people you kill, using a machine gun in battle is not a war crime because it does not cause unnecessary suffering; it simply performs its job horrifyingly well.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
When the term 'machine gun' enters common parlance, the word 'machine' becomes much more sinister.
When shooting in the dark, it is a good idea to use a machine gun.
We hear so much about weapons of mass destruction. But nine out of 10 war victims are killed by guns. It's the AK-47 that's a weapon of mass destruction.
I don't think you can perpetrate war crimes with defensive weapons, with air defense systems.
Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.
If you shell a military base and happen to kill civilians, you have not committed a war crime; if you deliberately target cities and towns, you have.
If you write any kind of fiction about America, you immediately have to start doing some research about guns, so in some ways, 'Gun Machine' is just the culmination of 20 years of reading about guns.
Nine out of 10 war victims die from a gun.
A weapon isn't good or bad, depends on the person who uses it.
War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.